Has this Affiliate taken things too far? Thoughts.
17. Apr 2007 | 35 Comments
I was horrified when I came across this website earlier today which is trying to capatilise on the VA Tech Shootings that happened this morning.
I personally out of morale issues would never ever dream of using something like this to make money. Especially having the balls to ask people to send flowers to loved ones through an affiliate link.
I understand that writing about breaking events can be profitable, but when they involve death that’s where I draw the line.
Would you stoop this low?
35 Comments on "Has this Affiliate taken things too far? Thoughts."
Adam
17. Apr 2007, 8:01 pm
That is just disgusting! I’ve been thinking of this today actually (but more due to the whole Halbert thing) and I think it’s a shame that some people have such a low character.
Stuart, how about putting a nofollow on the link, he doesn’t deserve your juice!
moneymaker
17. Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
i would never ever create such a blog. i cant even create a porn blog. my conscience would kill me.
Runa
17. Apr 2007, 9:07 pm
There’s really a lot of orrible people. I wouldn’t wonder if somebody does the same with campaigns for poor children or against diseases.
Chee Kui
17. Apr 2007, 9:07 pm
I think, his intention was good… there’s 10% discount.
But I wouldn’t do that myself….
Nenad Ristic
17. Apr 2007, 9:29 pm
Words fail me…
My moral standards are very different from most other people (for example, I have no problem with porn or drugs), but this is just low.
daminc
17. Apr 2007, 11:02 pm
such an asshat!
Jeremy Steele
17. Apr 2007, 11:31 pm
How the hell is that domain already functioning? Must have been one he owned already…
Mark from Bloglyne.com
17. Apr 2007, 11:38 pm
Hey Stuart – I have to say that I agree with Adam.
I would have Bumped the article but you have a “follow” on the link to the guys website. Which is allowing both of you to “profit” by generating traffic to the site based on the article. So, no Bump from me until you change that…
I get that you want to write about this topic, and to me that is fine, but don’t supply the guy who you are criticizing with extra link backs & traffic… there must be a better way…
Mark
18. Apr 2007, 1:48 am
I’d have to say that’s over the line. In regard to moneymaker’s comment “can’t even make a porn blog”, not that I have – but I wouldn’t have a problem with it. Loads of people search for porn and I generally don’t see a problem with providing something that people want.
However, this guy isn’t doing that. He is just cashing in…..
However, I made $60 on adsense from hosting the Saddam hanging video on my website. Does that make me bad? There were thousands of searches for that!
Stephen Ralph
18. Apr 2007, 5:24 am
If you ever have to ask yourself whether what you’re doing online is ethical than it’s clearly not. This is not.
It’s really pathetic what some marketers will do to earn cash. That includes peddling porn, that whole shady generic RX industry, payday (usury) loans and a whole bunch of other immoral businesses.
say what?
18. Apr 2007, 8:36 am
hmm…
I dont see what that blogger did as wrong?. You got one commentor saying he cashed in on the Sadam hanging and no one said anything. What?..is it because Sadam was considered a “bad-guy” so that gets a pass?
Another commentator noted that doing a porn site is okay, give the people what they want, with that idea, isnt the blogger giving the people a chance to give flowers to the slain victims? Maybe the ones who are really upset at this particular blogger are just mad that they didnt think of the idea first.
The blog itself is just doing is doing an ongoing coverage of the story. “…oOoOh, thats sooo bad..and horrible…” oh please, and you think giving people what they want with “porn” isnt bad? how porn can potentially ruin relationships and mess up people psychology…
All the more to the blogger, its not like he’s peddling child porn, he’s just doing coverage of the story.
Scott
18. Apr 2007, 9:36 am
Yo, Screw that mofo. If he didn’t wnat to make money it wouldn’y have been an affiliate link.
But on the other hand,
Money is money
Wealth Building Lessons
18. Apr 2007, 9:50 am
of course, there’s no such thing as bad publicity and by linking to his site, you’re making him famous!
Andrew Johnson
18. Apr 2007, 10:45 am
I turned on FOX news yesterday literly hours, or less, after the shootings and they already had flashy animations running on the side. The Virgina Tech logo and “massacre” with a red crosshairs in the background.
Is a news blog less tasteful because it has an affiliate link as opposed to a newspaper article saturated with PPC ads to mortgage offers?
Bill
18. Apr 2007, 10:49 am
I have a different take, it’s a free market. I feel that a person should have the right to enter the free market in any barrier they so wish.
With that said; it works both ways, while a person has the right to enter the free market, the free market has the right to not do business with that person on any principle the wish to recite.
Believe it or not the free market can govern itself, if enough people just opt not to do business with someone for whatever reason (in this case because they are obviously trying to capitalize on the misfortune of others) the that free market attempt fails and that person goes away.
Steve K.
18. Apr 2007, 1:12 pm
The affiliate ad was a bit over the top, but how is this different from foxnews.com, cnn.com, et.al. switching to their highest CPM ads in their inventory during their heavy traffic times?
He also was covering several different sources and was – at least appears to be – rewriting the stories into his own words prior to the links — not a simple copy/paste job.
But like I said, the affiliate ad was over the top, but I don’t see much wrong with the rest. And it looks like all advertising is gone now.
MM
18. Apr 2007, 2:59 pm
The domain names with the shooter’s name and every variation of it were all bought today.
There’ll be more of that garbage coming!
Rafa
18. Apr 2007, 3:07 pm
Domains can go live almost immediately after you register them.
Rafa
18. Apr 2007, 3:09 pm
Ismailax.com was also taken…that´s what the guy had written on his arm.
JT
18. Apr 2007, 5:03 pm
For all of you outraged: This is different from Fox News or CNN or ABC News… how, exactly? They’re running ads, running promo’s for their other shows, and so on.
Seriously, I’d like to know.
D. Psyko
18. Apr 2007, 6:14 pm
I thought I had posted earlier on this topic i guess it was either deleted or get sent to spam.
I saw the site earlier when it had an adsense ad on the right. I don’t think he did anything wrong.
for a site that was “profiting” from the tragedy I thought he should have had more ads up.
Why should news agencies make all the money? As you should know bad news makes money. His idea got me thinking.
The Dino
18. Apr 2007, 7:20 pm
People are always looking for gap in them market and this page could find it but I dont think he is going to profit on it because if there are people like you and me than they will not click any affiliate links anyway.
WebmasterX
19. Apr 2007, 12:20 am
“Would you stoop this low?”
You just did. Now if you had written about this touchy subject on a page with no links / banners / or other ads that made you money it would be different, but you didn’t.
VA Shootings
19. Apr 2007, 12:48 am
We couldn’t help but notice the plethera of ads on your site passing judgement about our site.
Kettle Black
Mark B
19. Apr 2007, 2:25 am
The blogger has posted a response to everyone who is bashing him:
http://www.vashootings.com/?p=37
Edwin
19. Apr 2007, 4:44 am
Turned into a Godaddy parking site…
So what do we think about that as cashing in on a tragedy
Brandon Hopkins
19. Apr 2007, 9:32 am
Looks like I missed the boat, it’s just a parked page now.
nicholas kamau
24. Apr 2007, 5:24 am
i am sorry but i would stoop this low, truth is this it seems people are just in for the money these days. instead i would build a more informative website with things like personal self defense.safe alternatives to self defense. things along that line.\
its not stooping low,please oil companies are killing thousands around the world so that we in america can have cheap oil, oil companies have a shitload of profit that just make us look silly, its not stooping low its being capitalistic
brian chappell
27. Apr 2007, 6:46 am
My mom sent me an email at 9:45am before all this really got leaked to the press. Being a webmaster at heart I went and checked on domain names, pretty much all of them at that time were available. I could have bought all of them but I couldn’t. Its just messed up to capitalize on a tragedy of this nature.
Team Tutorials
13. Jun 2007, 5:41 am
It was actually suggested to me to create a site for the victims to posts their comments. I just couldn’t do it. I don’t care how much money it would make at some point we have to have morals.
That is just disgusting! I’ve been thinking of this today actually (but more due to the whole Halbert thing) and I think it’s a shame that some people have such a low character.
Stuart, how about putting a nofollow on the link, he doesn’t deserve your juice!
i would never ever create such a blog. i cant even create a porn blog. my conscience would kill me.
There’s really a lot of orrible people. I wouldn’t wonder if somebody does the same with campaigns for poor children or against diseases.
I think, his intention was good… there’s 10% discount.
But I wouldn’t do that myself….
Words fail me…
My moral standards are very different from most other people (for example, I have no problem with porn or drugs), but this is just low.
such an asshat!
How the hell is that domain already functioning? Must have been one he owned already…
Hey Stuart – I have to say that I agree with Adam.
I would have Bumped the article but you have a “follow” on the link to the guys website. Which is allowing both of you to “profit” by generating traffic to the site based on the article. So, no Bump from me until you change that…
I get that you want to write about this topic, and to me that is fine, but don’t supply the guy who you are criticizing with extra link backs & traffic… there must be a better way…
I’d have to say that’s over the line. In regard to moneymaker’s comment “can’t even make a porn blog”, not that I have – but I wouldn’t have a problem with it. Loads of people search for porn and I generally don’t see a problem with providing something that people want.
However, this guy isn’t doing that. He is just cashing in…..
However, I made $60 on adsense from hosting the Saddam hanging video on my website. Does that make me bad? There were thousands of searches for that!
If you ever have to ask yourself whether what you’re doing online is ethical than it’s clearly not. This is not.
It’s really pathetic what some marketers will do to earn cash. That includes peddling porn, that whole shady generic RX industry, payday (usury) loans and a whole bunch of other immoral businesses.
hmm…
I dont see what that blogger did as wrong?. You got one commentor saying he cashed in on the Sadam hanging and no one said anything. What?..is it because Sadam was considered a “bad-guy” so that gets a pass?
Another commentator noted that doing a porn site is okay, give the people what they want, with that idea, isnt the blogger giving the people a chance to give flowers to the slain victims? Maybe the ones who are really upset at this particular blogger are just mad that they didnt think of the idea first.
The blog itself is just doing is doing an ongoing coverage of the story. “…oOoOh, thats sooo bad..and horrible…” oh please, and you think giving people what they want with “porn” isnt bad? how porn can potentially ruin relationships and mess up people psychology…
All the more to the blogger, its not like he’s peddling child porn, he’s just doing coverage of the story.
Yo, Screw that mofo. If he didn’t wnat to make money it wouldn’y have been an affiliate link.
But on the other hand,
Money is money
of course, there’s no such thing as bad publicity and by linking to his site, you’re making him famous!
I turned on FOX news yesterday literly hours, or less, after the shootings and they already had flashy animations running on the side. The Virgina Tech logo and “massacre” with a red crosshairs in the background.
Is a news blog less tasteful because it has an affiliate link as opposed to a newspaper article saturated with PPC ads to mortgage offers?
I have a different take, it’s a free market. I feel that a person should have the right to enter the free market in any barrier they so wish.
With that said; it works both ways, while a person has the right to enter the free market, the free market has the right to not do business with that person on any principle the wish to recite.
Believe it or not the free market can govern itself, if enough people just opt not to do business with someone for whatever reason (in this case because they are obviously trying to capitalize on the misfortune of others) the that free market attempt fails and that person goes away.
The affiliate ad was a bit over the top, but how is this different from foxnews.com, cnn.com, et.al. switching to their highest CPM ads in their inventory during their heavy traffic times?
He also was covering several different sources and was – at least appears to be – rewriting the stories into his own words prior to the links — not a simple copy/paste job.
But like I said, the affiliate ad was over the top, but I don’t see much wrong with the rest. And it looks like all advertising is gone now.
The domain names with the shooter’s name and every variation of it were all bought today.
There’ll be more of that garbage coming!
Domains can go live almost immediately after you register them.
Ismailax.com was also taken…that´s what the guy had written on his arm.
For all of you outraged: This is different from Fox News or CNN or ABC News… how, exactly? They’re running ads, running promo’s for their other shows, and so on.
Seriously, I’d like to know.
I thought I had posted earlier on this topic i guess it was either deleted or get sent to spam.
I saw the site earlier when it had an adsense ad on the right. I don’t think he did anything wrong.
for a site that was “profiting” from the tragedy I thought he should have had more ads up.
Why should news agencies make all the money? As you should know bad news makes money. His idea got me thinking.
People are always looking for gap in them market and this page could find it but I dont think he is going to profit on it because if there are people like you and me than they will not click any affiliate links anyway.
“Would you stoop this low?”
You just did. Now if you had written about this touchy subject on a page with no links / banners / or other ads that made you money it would be different, but you didn’t.
We couldn’t help but notice the plethera of ads on your site passing judgement about our site.
Kettle Black
The blogger has posted a response to everyone who is bashing him:
http://www.vashootings.com/?p=37
Turned into a Godaddy parking site…
So what do we think about that as cashing in on a tragedy
Looks like I missed the boat, it’s just a parked page now.
i am sorry but i would stoop this low, truth is this it seems people are just in for the money these days. instead i would build a more informative website with things like personal self defense.safe alternatives to self defense. things along that line.\
its not stooping low,please oil companies are killing thousands around the world so that we in america can have cheap oil, oil companies have a shitload of profit that just make us look silly, its not stooping low its being capitalistic
My mom sent me an email at 9:45am before all this really got leaked to the press. Being a webmaster at heart I went and checked on domain names, pretty much all of them at that time were available. I could have bought all of them but I couldn’t. Its just messed up to capitalize on a tragedy of this nature.
It was actually suggested to me to create a site for the victims to posts their comments. I just couldn’t do it. I don’t care how much money it would make at some point we have to have morals.
Supporters of the Cause
Popular Articles
- Ultimate Dofollow Social List
- Link Building Guide for 2008
- Become a Digg Power User in 48 Hours
- $800 a Day with Yahoo Answers
- Gmail Power Usage
- How to Work from Home - Efficiently
- Dominate Ebay Affiliate Program
- Making Money with Local Niche Directories
- Quick way to Make money with CPA Offers
- Diggproof & Speed up Wordpress
- Make Money with Clickbank & Articles
Recent Posts
- How Does the Panda/Farmer Update Impact Affiliates?
- StoreCrowd - $0 to $1M+ in Affiliate Sales in 12 Months
- Recropical Link Cloaking - What you Need to Know
- Twitter me Timbers: 5 Ways to Profit from Twitter
- Sitelinks FAIL
- Looking for a Ruby/Python Developer
- Ultimate Dofollow Social & Link Building List
- Aweber Form Trick to Triple Profits
- How to Apply & get Accepted by Affiliate Networks
- Advanced Forum Link Building
Affiliate Tools
- Affiliate Marketing Blogs
- Affiliate Network Reviews
- Web Hosting Reviews
- Affiliate Marketing Tools & Software

Enjoy this post? Get the RSS Feed















Done