Comments on: Google Removes “Supplemental Results” Tag

By: Google elimina la etiqueta “Resultado suplementario”

Google elimina la etiqueta “Resultado suplementario” — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:36:41 +0000

[...] Leer nota completa en Earner’s Blog. índice búsqueda google relevancia relevante resultado secundario suplementario [...]

By: julian

julian — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 07:28:03 +0000

I understand why google has removed this, but its a real pain. The ability to see which pages are “weak” ie. in the supplement index can only help. If we know which pages are “weak” or have “problems” we can attempt to fix them.

By: Scot Smith

Scot Smith — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:19:41 +0000

Hamlet Batista suggest a few ways to find supplemental pages. (hamletbatista.com). He has a tool that allows you to upload logs to determine which pages are supplemental. Not exactly sure what method he’s using, but it may be worth a look.

By: Dane Morgan

Dane Morgan — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 01:06:25 +0000

Interesting, except that Matt Cutts has made it plain that supplemental results tell you nothing about duplicate content, and everything about how you are moving page rank around.

By: Spuds

Spuds — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:32:23 +0000

I see good and bad in this.

By: Francesco | Guadagnare

Francesco | Guadagnare — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:55:15 +0000

This morning checking my firefox SEO tool I saw all of my pages showing not only in the supplemental as it used to do, but also in the google cache. I thought I did a good job following your directions on the use of the robots.txt but I guess now I understand the real reason.

I hope this might help indexing my blog a bit better.

Ciao
Francesco

By: Glen Allsopp

Glen Allsopp — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 08:33:54 +0000

I certainly don’t think its good, I want to know which pages arent determined quality and why

Thankfully theres still a few ways to search for them