Google Removes “Supplemental Results” Tag
06. Aug 2007 | 7 Comments
If you’re like me, you will have struggled with the term Supplemental results since 2003. They have been the source of many headaches & frustration, not to mention sheer panic.
Well, Google has finally announced that they’ll no longer be labelling Supplemental Results.
The changes we make must focus on improving the search experience for our users. Since 2006, we’ve completely overhauled the system that crawls and indexes supplemental results. The current system provides deeper and more continuous indexing. Additionally, we are indexing URLs with more parameters and are continuing to place fewer restrictions on the sites we crawl. As a result, Supplemental Results are fresher and more comprehensive than ever. We’re also working towards showing more Supplemental Results by ensuring that every query is able to search the supplemental index, and expect to roll this out over the course of the summer.
Whilst this may initially sound good, it’s hard to tell how this will effect search marketers. It all depends on how much visibility supplemental results will continue to get as changes are introduced, will this visibility increase?
I’ve always been a big fan of the labelling of Supplementals. It allows me to quickly assess a website for any particular problems, including:
- Link Saturation
- Indexing Problems
- Duplicate Content Problems
I’ve heard rumors that this may be getting integrated into the Webmaster Console but if you check out Matt Cutts latest poll, there’s much jucier features i’d like to see first (and everyone else for that matter).
Enjoy this post? Get the RSS FeedTags: Search Engine Optimisation or Share This
|
| ![]() |
7 Comments on "Google Removes “Supplemental Results” Tag"
This morning checking my firefox SEO tool I saw all of my pages showing not only in the supplemental as it used to do, but also in the google cache. I thought I did a good job following your directions on the use of the robots.txt but I guess now I understand the real reason.
I hope this might help indexing my blog a bit better.
Ciao
Francesco
I see good and bad in this.
Interesting, except that Matt Cutts has made it plain that supplemental results tell you nothing about duplicate content, and everything about how you are moving page rank around.
Hamlet Batista suggest a few ways to find supplemental pages. (hamletbatista.com). He has a tool that allows you to upload logs to determine which pages are supplemental. Not exactly sure what method he’s using, but it may be worth a look.
I understand why google has removed this, but its a real pain. The ability to see which pages are “weak” ie. in the supplement index can only help. If we know which pages are “weak” or have “problems” we can attempt to fix them.
Add a Comment
Categories
- Affiliate Marketing
- Affiliate Marketing News
- Affiliate Networks
- Copywriting
- Earners Blog News
- Earnosphere
- Email Marketing
- General Musings
- Guides
- Keyword Research
- Link Building
- Marketing Tools
- Monetization
- Outside the Box
- PPC
- Productivity
- Reviews
- Search Engine Optimisation
- Social Media Optimisation
- Tips & Tricks
- Top Posts
- Traffic Generation
- Wealth Creation
- Web Development
- Wordpress








I certainly don’t think its good, I want to know which pages arent determined quality and why
Thankfully theres still a few ways to search for them